Intended learning outcomes: Explain the determination of rated capacity as the product of theoretical capacity, capacity utilization, and work center efficiency.
Section 1.2.4 already presented basic definitions around work center and capacity. This chapter presents them in a more detailed way.
Depending on the type of work center, different capacities will be used as the primary basis for capacity management and for allocating costs:
- Machine capacity (referred to as machine hours, when using hours as the capacity unit), that is, the capacity of machines and equipment to produce output, is frequently used for parts manufacturing.
- Labor capacity (referred to as labor hours, when using hours as capacity unit), that is, the capacity of workers to produce output, is frequently used for assembly or stores.
These concepts are part of the capacity determination, as shown in Figure 14.1.1.1.
Fig. 14.1.1.1 Determination of capacity. Rated capacity is the product of theoretical capacity, capacity utilization, and work center efficiency.
Theoretical capacity is the maximum output capacity, with no adjustments for unplanned downtime, determined by the number of shifts, the capacity theoretically available for each shift, and the number of machines and workers. The value thus determined applies up to a given boundary date, after which the calculation factors may change.
Theoretical capacity can also vary from one week to the next in response to foreseen, overlapping changes that must be taken into account, such as
- Scheduled downtime, that is, downtime due to individual workers’ vacations or for
preventive maintenance, for example. - Scheduled overtime due to additional shifts, for instance.
Planned capacity utilization is a measure of how intensively a resource should be used to produce a good or service. Traditionally, it is the ratio of actual load to theoretical capacity. There are two distinct factors in capacity utilization:
- Availability (in capacity): Downtime due to breaks, cleaning tasks, clearing up, unplanned absences, breakdowns, etc., must be considered for each work center. These losses are considered by the availability factor (hours actually worked / hours available).
- Tactical underload or underutilization: To avoid long queue times (see Section 13.2.3) or for non-bottleneck capacities or nonconstraint work centers, the desired capacity utilization should generally be less than 100%.
The measurement of actual capacity utilization cannot as a rule be broken down according to the two factors. This is the main reason for capturing availability and tactical underload in one factor, namely, capacity utilization.
The work center efficiency (or efficiency rate) is the ratio of “standard load to actual load,” “standard hours produced to actual hours worked,” or “actual units produced to standard units to produce” (see [ASCM22]), averaged over all the operations performed at the center.[note 1401].
Rated capacity is the expected output capability of a work center. It is defined as theoretical capacity times planned capacity utilization times work center efficiency.
We should therefore consider standard load to be scheduled (that is, load on the basis of standard setup and run loads) to rated capacity, and not to theoretical capacity.
The overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) includes the achieved quality. OEE can be defined as planned capacity utilization times work center efficiency times the yield factor.
In principle, rough-cut planning uses the same attributes, usually applied to fully utilized work centers at the level of the department or entire plant. The capacity of a rough-cut work center is thus not necessarily equal to the sum of all the individual capacities concerned.
Continuation in next subsection (14.1.1b).
Course section 14.1: Subsections and their intended learning outcomes
14.1 Fundamentals of Capacity Management
Intended learning outcomes: Produce an overview on capacity, work centers, capacity determination, and capacity management techniques.
14.1.1 Capacity, Work Center Efficiency, and Rated Capacity
Intended learning outcomes: Explain the determination of rated capacity as the product of theoretical capacity, capacity utilization, and work center efficiency.
14.1.1b Demonstrated Capacity, Productive Capacity, Excess Capacity, Idle Capacity
Intended learning outcomes: Produce an overview on other capacity definitions and their relationship to each other, such as demonstrated capacity, productive capacity, protective capacity, excess capacity, idle capacity, and activation.
14.1.2 Overview of Capacity Management Techniques
Intended learning outcomes: Differentiate between infinite loading and finite loading. Identify the characteristics of algorithms for sufficient overall capacity planning flexibility and little overall capacity planning flexibility. Produce an overview on techniques for infinite loading and for finite loading.
